< dogscatskidslife, TJ Morgan, veterinary technician, veterinary medicine, consumer, activist, day to day real life events, writer, stories, photographs, photographer, CafePress.

Friday, August 24, 2007

When Hype Hurts...

The Oklahoma State Fair will soon be underway and is an event that is looked forward to by tens of thousands of Oklahomans, both young and old. This year the fair will run from September 13th through the 23rd and it is expected to be one of the biggest events of 2007 as the state continues to celebrate its 100th year of statehood.

Many people think that the state fair consists of rodeos, entertainment, and the Midway with its numerous carnival rides and food vendors. However, the state fair has many educational experiences as well throughout its ten day run.

For several years now the Oklahoma Veterinary Medical Association has sponsored an educational exhibit on the fair grounds.

One of my blogging friends, Shelly, was reviewing the events that were scheduled for this year's fair and ran across the promotional blurb about the OVMA exhibit. Shelly blogged about it and posted her feelings concerning the exhibit. She also left a comment here on my blog asking for my opinion.

Here is the excerpt about the OVMA demonstration exhibit as written by those who are in charge of the State Fair publicity compaign:

VETERINARY SURGICAL CENTER

Can you stomach seeing a live surgery? Oklahoma Veterinary Medical Association (OVMA) Veterinarians will perform a live surgery right before your eyes and show the entire spaying process of a female dog. It’s just like being in the operating room with play by play commentating. It’s an educational experience for the whole family. All dogs having this procedure will be available for adoption. So be sure to visit the Oklahoma City Animal Shelter table and find out more about how to take one of these loving pets home.

Monday – Thursday • 6:30 p.m.
Saturday & Sunday • 2:00 & 6:30 p.m.
Location: Barn #3



I assure you that the OVMA is not wanting to sensationalize this intricately planned educational exhibit. There are hours upon hours of planning that goes into pulling such a demonstration together. Additionally, all of this is done on a voluntary basis by veterinarians and their support staff from within the state. My employer, Dr. Tina Neel, serves on the planning committee and some of our doctors and staff volunteer their time to help man the exhibit. There are thousands of dollars of time, equipment, supplies, medicines, and ancillary items that are donated in hopes that the general public will gain an understanding of responsible pet ownership as well as modern veterinary medicine.

It is a committed group of individuals who work tirelessly to bring veterinary medicine out of the dark ages and strive to raise the standards in the field as a whole.

Why are there still hundreds of thousands of unwanted, unspayed, and unneutered pets in this nation?

Public education is imperative.

How many people understand that the technology and equipment is available for our pets unless they are shown?

We have gas anesthesia machines that deliver safe inhalant anesthetics. The days of having an IV anesthetic taped to the leg of a patient using a straight needle should be gone. For some, this is still the norm in the surgical suite; but how is the public going to know there is a better and safer way unless they are taught?

How many individuals expect to have surgery without the basics of screening blood work, or EKG, CO2, and blood pressure monitoring?

How about pain control? Would you like for your doctor to ask you to "bite the bullet" after an extensive orthopedic procedure?

There are many people who are not aware that these things are available for their pets.

Why?

Because they have never been told about it or seen it in use.

It is the hope of many veterinary professionals to stop the uncontrolled repopulation of pets as well as raise the standards of care for your personal pet.

In order to do this, the public has to understand what the standards should be.


That is what this exhibit is all about...

Education.


I apologize for any misunderstanding that may have been caused by the promotional hype by the State Fair organization.

Because that is not our intent at all.


later...

Labels: , ,

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Today's Mailbag...



Every once in a while I receive a forwarded e-mail that is worthy of a second look.

This particular e-mail hooked me because it touches on one of the greatest dangers our children can face.

Drowning is the second leading cause of accidental-injury related death among children ages 1 to 14 and the leading cause of accidental-injury related death among children ages 1 to 4


The e-mail had a link to this compelling video which is provided by the folks at Infant Swimming Resource.

Over half of the children between the ages of 1 to 4 who die from drowning do so in a swimming pool. And many of these deaths occur at their own homes.

I have always felt that in order to help protect my children that it was imperative to teach my children how to swim.

However, this swimming program takes it to the next level... survival.


What a great e-mail to forward.


later...

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

The Latest News...

Linda in Norman e-mailed me the other day to tell me that it has been quite some time since I have posted anything on my blog.

When I looked at the date of my last post, I found it hard to believe that it has been 13 days!

Two weeks without a post?

How unlike me.


*sigh*


Needless to say, I have been inundated with an enormous amount of school work. If I told you guys how many hours I have spent in research and writing for my class assignments alone...

Well, let's just say that I am certain that you would understand why I haven't posted.


For example, in one class alone I have typed 18,772 words. Of course, this is a word count for the finished product as recorded by my Word documents.

Another neat thing about the statistics that Word records on your documents is the amount of time that is spent on editing the document. I think that the amount of time that is spent on projects tells a much clearer story.

In this same class I spent 5478 minutes editing those 18,772 words. This calculates into 91.3 hours of my life that was used to to type these papers up. Of course, this does not include how much time was spent on reading and researching the topics that I was writing about. However, I did not keep a manual record of these efforts.


Albeit, I spent an enormous amount of time on these assignments, I am happy to announce that I did earn an "A" for the class. My professor e-mailed me this afternoon to let me know what my grade was before she was required to post it officially.

She also gave me quite a compliment.

So... In the end, it was all worth it because I achieved my goal!


In other news...

I know that I had a lot of people worrying about me and my ONG bill and the overcharge from my account via the automatic payment plan.

I have been so busy that I haven't been monitoring my bills like I should. I was yanked into reality when they *dinged* my account for an EXTRA $75. Of course, this caused me to pull all my old bills out, go out and read my meter myself, and make a phone call that put me in that endless on hold loop for over 30 minutes.

I won't go into all of the *gory* details of my telephone conversation with the customer service rep when I called about my bill.

Let's just say that I became very frustrated with her because she WOULD NOT SHUT UP and listen to my reasoning and logic. While I didn't have all the facts in front of me "like she did", I had a pretty good idea of what had happened to my account. She kept telling me that I OWED Oklahoma Natural Gas money!! She refused to listen to me. I know that she thought I was crazy...

And stupid as well.

BTW... if you really want to make me mad, just ~act~ like you think I'm stupid.

I tried my best to get to a supervisor, but you know how that first line of defense works. They won't let you get past them.

The next day I finally got through to a supervisor. While she didn't quite understand my logic or reasoning, she could tell that something "just wasn't right" with my account. She promised that she would send it over to the "Accounting Department".

Long story short...

ONG ended up crediting my account $318.23.


Oh yeah... uh huh...


That customer service rep was wrong, and I was right.


You know that I really didn't have the time to deal with those people, but for $300 I figure that it's worth it.


HOWEVER... I think I still need to write a letter to ONG because they don't REFUND you the money. They only credit your account.

Which, in my opinion, is wrong, wrong, wrong.


There's a lot of things that I need to share with you guys, but I'll only share a few more things.


One is a new phishing scam. The last couple of weeks I have been getting hit with spam that presents itself as an e-card. It says things like, "Your family member has sent you an e-card!" or "Your friend has sent you a card!". There's one that uses Hallmark's name on it too.

You get the idea.

They're FAKE e-mail greeting cards.

I knew that these cards were probably worse than the annoying spam that we all usually get. But I never took the time to research it. This evening I took a few minutes and I was able to confirm my suspicions.

Anyway, in the body of the e-mail is a link that you click on and it takes you to a website. This website downloads malicious spyware, etc., on your computer when you land on it. With this "mal-ware" the people on the other end can gather your credit card numbers, passwords, or anything else that you type on your computer or online.

So I thought that this was something important for you guys to know. You can read this short article about it.


Let's see...

What else.


Oh yeah...


Do you guys remember me mentioning that I had been summoned as a petit juror to the Federal Court?

Well, I had to show up yesterday morning at 7:30 am. We had orientation, swearing in, and all that stuff. They told us that we had to be available through August 10th. They also said that most trials usually only last about two to three days.


I ended up being selected as a juror for a criminal trial...

And the judge told us that it was certain to last for FIVE days at the very least. Maybe into the following week?


Can you believe this?


So...


What have you guys been up to?


Hopefully, I be back here sooner than...


later...

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, June 11, 2007

The Development of Cancer Vaccines...

Earlier this year it was announced that a cancer vaccine for canine melanoma had been approved for a conditional license by the USDA.

The vaccine is currently being distributed to selected facilities and has recently arrived at Oklahoma State University's Veterinary Teaching Hospital in Stillwater, Oklahoma.

The conditional license is valid for one year, which at the conclusion, all the data from the treated animals will be gathered and evaluated. The results of the data will determine whether or not the license will be renewed for further study.

It takes several years of research for medicines of this nature to make it to this stage of development. Additionally, USDA-APHIS (United States Department of Agriculture-Animal Plant Health Inspection Service) reserves the right to issue these special licenses under certain circumstances. According to APHIS, "the vaccine has been shown to aid in cancer treatment for dogs and has demonstrated a reasonable expectation of efficacy to increase the survival time of dogs with oral melanoma."

Probably the most significant aspect of this vaccine is the fact that it has had some very promising preliminary results which led to the conditional licensing. What should be even more encouraging, to the general public as a whole, is that the canine melanoma vaccine could be a significant breakthrough in cancer research. It is hoped that the research associated with this vaccine will be very instrumental in furthering the development and release of cancer vaccines for humans.

Similar vaccines for humans are currently being researched, however the conditional license for the canine cancer vaccine is considered a major breakthrough.






USDA ISSUES CONDITIONAL LICENSE FOR CANINE MELANOMA VACCINE (26Mar2007)

Retrospective Study of 338 Canine Oral Melanomas with Clinical, Histologic, and Immunohistochemical Review of 129 Cases (2000)


Long-Term Survival of Dogs with Advanced Malignant Melanoma after DNA Vaccination with Xenogeneic Human Tyrosinase (2003)

Canine Treatments May Shed Light on Cancer

Labels: ,

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Today's Mailbag...

I know that everyone is interested in reading my mail.

If it's something that I'm interested in, then you must be interested in it too.

Right?


Today I received an interesting letter in the mail from Nationals, Incorporated. Yes... they spell "incorporated" out and do not use the abbreviation.


The letter starts out like this:

My name is Anna Klejnowski. I am a Coordinator for this year's 2007 Oklahoma City Pageant that is a preliminary pageant to the Cities of America National Competition that takes place in Orlando, Florida. You have been referred to me as having a daughter between the ages of 10 and 19 within your family who may enjoy modeling in front of an audience and learning modeling routines that enable her to accomplish her goals on stage...



That's when I stop for a second and think to myself, "Who in the heck gave them information about me and my daughter?!"

I couldn't think of anyone, so then I tried to remember if I had filled out any "survey" type forms, etc., and gotten myself on a mailing list of some sort.

No... I don't recall having done that.


The letter is addressed to me with my ~formal~ name. Not as T.J. A credit card company? Certainly I have never told them about my kids...


The letter continues...

No past experience is necessary and training will be provided to all participants through a training class and rehearsal that will be conducted. The Oklahoma City Pageant Production is sponsored through different businesses and organizations in the Oklahoma City and surrounding areas.

Judging is based on personality, casual wear and formal wear modeling. There is no bathing suit or talent competition involved in this year's pageant."



Of course, the words bathing suit certainly conjured up an image in my mind. My daughter model a swimsuit? In front of an audience? I don't think so.

After that vision, a question soon formed:

"Why is there not a bathing suit or talent competition for this year's competition?"


Suspicion about this letter was beginning to creep in.


I would be happy to personally meet with both of you as I will be meeting with other young ladies on Sunday, May 20, 2007. By attending, she will have the opportunity to meet with me personally as I provide her with all the information on this year's production....



Particulars are then given as to time and place. The fact that she can bring a friend who may be interested in this opportunity. Although they do have to meet eligibility requirements.

We're also asked to pre-register at their website.


Even though suspicion was raised early on while I was reading this letter, I must tell you that I considered letting my daughter do something like this.

I think that it's something that she would like to do and it could be a fun experience

And of course, I feel that she is a beautiful child and would do well.


However, I just felt that the letter was just weird all the way around.


I went to their website. It certainly isn't set up to be very informative and open.


I then went to the Better Business Bureau and did a search on the company.


That's where I read this:

Participating in a beauty pageant may provide a rewarding experience, but many would-be contestants find that some pageant promoters do not deliver what they promise. Participants sometimes complain that no pageant exists. Check-out a pageants promoters before making a commitment.

Realistically assess your chances for success. Many people compete; few openings exist. Few people possess the unique combination of physical qualities and camera-friendly features to compete in an established pageant. Beware of any agency which requires payment for classes, or requires you to use a particular photographer exclusively.

Before signing agreements or paying fees, ask for written information. Rules, requirements, fees, and prizes should be explained. Costs may include wardrobe, make-up, travel, food, and lodging. You may also have to buy or sell tickets, advertise in a program, or purchase pictures or videos.

Investigate the pageant promoter's history. Request names of former participants. Ask past winners about their prizes. Did they receive all of their promised prizes? Speak to contestants who did not win as well, and ask about the criteria for judging.

Get all promises in writing. If the contract includes a cancellation clause, review it carefully. If you withdraw, you or part of your money. Read and understand the
whole contract and know what your responsibilities and obligations are before signing.

To hear more about beauty pageants, dial 412-456-2700 and listen to Tel-Tips message 50935.


Even though Nationals, Incorporated has a satisfactory rating I must tell you that the BBB's information 'blurb' was quite the eye-opener.


By the way...

I like their idea of having "Tel-Tips".


I then found out that there was a scandalous incident associated with their "pageant" in Orlando in 2003 which involved a registered sex offender.


The article is entitled, "Modeling Scam Suspect Accused Of Sex Crimes".


Nationals, Incorporated had several locations pop up in the Better Business Bureau search. The return address on my letter and envelope is 1951 Shenango Valley Freeway, Suite 2 South, Hermitage, PA 16148.



A few more things here....

Do you remember this statement:

The Oklahoma City Pageant Production is sponsored through different businesses and organizations in the Oklahoma City and surrounding areas.


None of these businesses are listed in the letter.

Who are they?

Are they reputable?

Could they be a *vendor* similar to the one in the above article?


Are they sex offendors posing as photographers and talent agents?


Also, I think that it is interesting to note that the website listed in the letter as oklahomacitypageant.com is the exact same website as listed here for the parent(?) company.

This is the URL:

http://www.nationalsincorporated.com/nationals.swf


Some may call that efficient. But I call it weird. Especially since I was expecting information specifically tailored for my Oklahoma City market.


At least that's what we're viewed as, right?


A market? I wonder how much money these people want? $1000? $2000?

How much are plane tickets to Orlando?


It doesn't really matter though...


Because I don't believe that we will be attending this year's event.


later...

Labels: ,

Friday, May 11, 2007

Today's Mailbag...

The other day I received this invitation from The National Scholars Honor Society.




I have to be honest with you guys...

I felt a sense of ~pride~ wash over me.

In fact, I felt my head starting to swell a bit.


I think that is what brought me back to earth. An emotional chord had been struck.

And I am ashamed to say, it was struck fairly easily.


When I pulled my a**...

ahem...

What I meant to say is that when I pulled my head out of the clouds I seriously began thinking about this opportunity and the consequences that it could present.

So, I decided that I would see what would happen if I "applied" for membership.


I went online to their website at www.collegehonors.org.

I was wanting to see how they compared to other vanity type opportunities such as Metropolitan Who's Who, Cambridge Who's Who, et.al.


There was a section provided for me to write in my "accomplishments", biography, and all of that stuff.


All I did was put in a ~one liner~.

This is what I put in the little box:

Who's Who Among Students in American Universities and Colleges



I don't remember how long it was before I received an e-mail reply.

(Time just seems to get away from me.)


I had planned on writing a post about all of this as well as portions of the e-mail, but I got busy again and put it on the back burner.


Well today I received another e-mail from them. So that gave me the impetus to write the post.


The e-mail states (bold is my emphasis):

Thank you for your interest in The National Scholars Honor Society. The membership committee has reviewed and approved your application for membership.


It is my honor and privilege to extend congratulations on your acceptance into The National Scholars Honor Society. Our membership of over 60,000 university scholars and students welcomes you.


Your Membership Acceptance Key is:
** **** ****
(You will need this to complete your membership.)


As a member of The National Scholars Honor Society, you gain the right and privilege of listing your membership on applications, professional credentials, curriculum vitae, and resumes. Upon accepting your membership, you will receive The National Scholars Membership Document, a parchment document suitable for framing. You will also receive a complimentary copy of "The System. The tools you need to get the grades you want."


After an initial review of your file, you have not been selected to receive a scholarship.


You have two options for accepting your membership and submitting the membership fee: Online (for credit card payment), or regular mail (for check or money order). There are no additional fees or dues.


If you choose the Online option (pay your membership fee via Visa or MasterCard), you may follow this link http://www.collegehonors.org/ccpsystem.htm to complete an online Membership Acceptance Form and pay your membership fee via Visa or MasterCard.


If you choose regular mail (pay your membership fee via check or money order), then your next step is to complete, print and return the Membership Acceptance Form along with a check or money order for $85.00, payable to The National Scholars. This link will open the printable Membership Acceptance Form http://www.collegehonors.org/MembershipAcceptanceForm.pdf


I personally welcome you to The National Scholars Honor Society, and wish you continued success.

Kevin Wakeman MD
President , The National Scholars Honor Society



I have to say that deep down I was disappointed. Not only had I been rejected for a "scholarship", but I felt that it was just someone else trying to get some of my hard earned money.

And what would I have in return for the $85 fee?

I don't really know. Perhaps it would look good on a resume`?


And besides...

I can dream up just about anything I want and place it on parchment paper at Kinko's for a lot less money.


In researching this opportunity on the internet I discovered that there are a whole slew of "scholastic scams".

For some reason I was surprised. I suppose that I had mistakenly thought that scholastics was somewhere in the same neighborhood of integrity, honesty, and achievement.

But I guess I was wrong.


A few universities have warnings on their school websites and offer advice.

They tell you to ask yourself questions like this one:

If I put the honorary on my resume, and a prospective employer asks me about it, how will I respond?


I also found out that there are scholarship scams. These people ask you for money in order to give you money in the form of a scholarship.

Does this make sense to you?


UCLA has an interesting resource site that tells you where you can report scams and stuff like that.


And Williamette University has a helpful page about scams that is entitled Scholarship Information.


I then ran across the Association of College Honor Societies. These people basically say that if the society isn't one of their members then it could be a scam.

Could that be true?

Who knows. The National Scholars Honor Society isn't on their list.

But neither is Alpha Sigma Lambda. An honor society that I was inducted into at the university that I attend.

Alpha Sigma Lambda does seem to meet their criteria and standards that the ACHS have listed in their How to Judge the Credibility of an Honor Society page. However, I didn't have to pay Alpha Sigma Lambda a dime for anything. Not even for the little finger sandiches that I ate at the special induction ceremony.

Could it be that you have to pay an enormous membership fee as a society to be a part of ~their~ organization?


Interesting.


Sounds like this scholastic thing could be fairly lucrative.


As far as The National Scholars Honor Society goes they do have a satisfactory rating with the Better Business Bureau.

And they've almost been in business for 5 years and are upfront about the things that they don't do.

They don't write letters of recommendation.

They don't issue press releases.

They don't host public ceremonies for induction or graduation.

And they don't sell or distribute honor cords.



I guess whether or not you choose to join any of these organizations is solely dependent on what you expect to receive from them.

After you write your check out of course.


later...

Labels: ,

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

It Isn't Wheat Gluten?

The investigation expands and continues concerning the Pet Food Recall of 2007.

International expansion of the investigation has begun and United States officials have finally been allowed into China. The Chinese government appears to be taking the food health concerns seriously.

China launched a food and drug safety crackdown on Wednesday, following an announcement that authorities detained managers from two companies linked to contaminated pet food that killed dogs and cats in North America.


This article only scratches the surface on the corruption that is present in Chinese bureaucracy.

Meanwhile, state side, it has been discovered that the tainted wheat gluten wasn't really wheat gluten at all.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that the contaminated wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate imported from China—associated with the deaths of at least 16 dogs and cats and the recall of hundreds of dog and cat food brands—was mislabeled and was really wheat flour contaminated with melamine and melamine-related products.


And now, the animals affected with tainted feed stuffs includes an untold number of catfish.


While there still aren't any official final numbers on how many pets have died from eating the tainted pet foods there is evidence that progress is being made.

In fact, according to Cornell University, one of our patients was found to be the first pet to have traces of melamine in the circulating blood supply as well as in the kidneys.

This is our first and only patient that has received a melamine positive report from the laboratory.

According to various news articles the official number of melamine related pet deaths stands at 16. However, I cannot confirm this number at either of the AVMA or FDA websites.


My boss, Dr. Tina Neel, writes a bi-monthly article for The Daily Oklahoman. Her articles can be found in the "YOU" section of the paper and are also available online.

She also has a recent NewsOk podcast about the pet food recall.

(By the way, she was recovering from a severe case of laryngitis when she made this podcast. In fact, she had just gotten her voice back.)


At this time, scientists still seem to be fairly confident that there are not any melamine-related risks to humans.

However, some of you may be interested in reading a South African study summary about melamine crystalluria (crystals in the urine) in sheep that was reported in 1966.


It looks like melamine has been around for a very, very long time.


And the idea of using it in animal feed has been too.


Now I wonder who was thinking that melamine could possibly be beneficial as food.


And since it is a chemical without any obvious nutritional value or benefits...


It makes me wonder why they thought it was a good idea in the first place.


later...




New Melamine and Cyanuric Acid Theory...

Melamine Contamination Advances to Poultry Production...

Melamine and Melamine Related Compounds...

Pet Foods=Human Foods... It's All the Same Thing

Pet Food Recall Expands to Rice Protein...

Royal Canin States: We're Not Involved...

The Pet Food Recall Expands... Again.

FDA Announces: Melamine in Tainted Pet Foods...

Menu Foods Posts FAQ's Page...

Pet Food Recall...

Still Looking for Answers on the 2007 Pet Food Recall...

Menu Foods Pet Food Recall Update

Labels:

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

New Melamine and Cyanuric Acid Theory...

**UPDATE**

Here's an article that I think that many of you will be interested in.

Chinese Businesses Say Animal Feed Commonly Laced with Mildly Toxic Melamine

"We've been running the melamine feed business for about 15 years and receiving positive responses from our customers," Wang said in a telephone interview.

"Using the proper quantity of melamine will not harm the animals. Our products are very safe, for sure," Wang said.

Although apparently widely practiced in China, concern over the use of melamine arose only in March, after the U.S. recall of nearly 100 brands of pet food made with wheat gluten contaminated by the chemical. Adding melamine to food is illegal under U.S. law, and China's government last week said it was banning its use in food products.

Cyanuric acid, which was found in urine samples from animals that died, and melamine, a compound identified in the gluten found in the recalled pet food, react with one another to form crystals that may block kidney function, researchers at the University of Guelph said Friday.

...Adding melamine raises the nitrogen level of feed, making it appear that the feed is higher in protein without increasing its nutritional value. That makes it attractive to makers of feed for stock animals such as pigs, chickens, and fish, as well as companies that make prepared foods for household pets such as cats and dogs.

..."As far as I know, there are no rules of regulations that make this illegal. As to whether melamine is toxic or not, I believe it won't do any harm if there is only very small amount," Ji said. "Otherwise, those companies could not do that."

Calls to China's food safety regulator, the State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection & Quarantine, rang unanswered Monday afternoon.

Tainted animal feed is merely the latest revelation about China's food safety woes, ranging from dye-tainted fish, and fake baby formula to the alleged use of ingredients intended for animal consumption to make snack foods.



I'm sooo glad I don't shop for groceries in China.

Hopefully, our food manufacturers will quit shopping there and buy their ingredients here in the United States.


~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

(Bold is my emphasis.)

AVMA Press Release

For More Information:
Tom McPheron
Phone: 847-285-6781
Cell: 773-494-5419
e-mail: tmcpheron@avma.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 1, 2007


Melamine and Cyanuric Acid Interaction May Play Part in Illness and Death from Recalled Pet Food

SCHAUMBURG, Ill.
— Tests conducted on contaminated pet food and necropsies from affected animals have resulted in a new theory to explain how animals are being adversely affected by contaminated pet foods. A chemical reaction between melamine and cyanuric acid is suspected of forming crystals and blocking kidney function.

The investigation into contaminated pet food has focused on melamine contamination of ingredients imported from China, such as wheat gluten, rice protein concentrate and corn gluten (imported into South Africa). It is now believed that cyanuric acid, as well as melamine, has been found in urine samples from animals that died.

Analysis of the crystals in the kidneys of affected animals have revealed that they are approximately 70 percent cyanuric acid and 30 percent melamine, and are extremely insoluble. Furthermore, tests mixing melamine and cyanuric acid in samples of cat urine resulted in almost immediate formation of crystals that were identical to crystals found in the kidneys of affected animals. Two other melamine- related substances—ammelide and ammeline—may also play roles and are under investigation.

As the recalls continue, the AVMA reminds pet owners and veterinarians that over 98 percent of pet foods are still deemed safe and haven't been recalled. The FDA is currently testing 100 percent of wheat gluten, rice protein concentrate, corn gluten, corn meal, soy protein, and rice bran being imported from China for these contaminants. The most recent pet food recalls have been undertaken proactively, due to association with involved ingredients and suppliers rather than as the result of complaints that animals that have consumed the food and become ill.

Most affected cats and dogs are recovering through use of standard fluid therapy and supportive care. The AVMA urges all veterinarians who have seen animals they suspect have been affected by a contaminated pet food to submit their findings to an ongoing survey. This survey is being conducted by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD) and is accessible at http://www.aavld.org.

The AAVLD Web site also offers a protocol for sample submission and a list of accredited veterinary diagnostic laboratories. It is important to note that samples from the kidneys should not be preserved in formalin, as the crystals seem to dissolve over time in formalin. Instead, they should be preserved in 100 percent ethanol or snap-frozen in OCT medium and sent to a diagnostic laboratory on dry ice.

A comprehensive AVMA Pet Food Recall List is available at http://www.avma.org/aa/menufoodsrecall/products.asp. The AVMA Pet Food Recall List contains all recall information that has come to the attention of the AVMA, but it is not guaranteed to be complete. The AVMA encourages all concerned to contact the specific manufacturer regarding the status of any particular pet food or treat.

For more information, please visit the AVMA web site at www.avma.org.


Melamine Contamination Advances to Poultry Production...

Melamine and Melamine Related Compounds...

Pet Foods=Human Foods... It's All the Same Thing

Pet Food Recall Expands to Rice Protein...

Royal Canin States: We're Not Involved...

The Pet Food Recall Expands... Again.

FDA Announces: Melamine in Tainted Pet Foods...

Menu Foods Posts FAQ's Page...

Pet Food Recall...

Still Looking for Answers on the 2007 Pet Food Recall...

Menu Foods Pet Food Recall Update

Labels:

Monday, April 30, 2007

Melamine Contamination Advances to Poultry Production...

Linda in Norman has given me another heads up on the now infamous 2007 Food Crisis.

None of us really have to worry about this latest joint announcement by the FDA and USDA.

Because the chickens that ate the tainted "foul feed" have been processed and consumed by us already.


Yes...

Another update has come this week. This time it is chickens that have consumed tainted feed.



Since the FDA isn't quite sure how these chemicals will affect humans, I propose the following:

We should go ahead and save all the pork and chicken, butcher it, freeze it, and then use it to feed inmates who are sentenced to life in prison or who are on death row.

You know, people are beginning to think that lethal injection isn't humane. So why not feed these people fried chicken and pork chops. They'll have a nice smile on their face while providing us with some beneficial scientific data.

I think these guys would be a good group to put in the test group as well.



Well, maybe they wouldn't eat the pork, but I think that they can eat rice cakes and chicken.


Actually, we probably should just ship it all back to China and cut our losses.


How many boatloads of that stuff have they been shipping us anyway?


Maybe it's time for us to make a change.


later...





Joint Update: FDA/USDA Trace Adulterated Animal Feed to Poultry


WASHINGTON, April 30, 2007 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have learned that byproducts from pet food manufactured with contaminated wheat gluten imported from China have been used in chicken feed on some farms in the state of Indiana. This information came to light as part of the continuing investigation into imported rice protein concentrate and wheat gluten that have been found to contain melamine and melamine-related compounds.

At this time, the investigation indicates that approximately 30 broiler poultry farms and eight breeder poultry farms in Indiana received contaminated feed in early February and fed it to poultry within days of receiving it. All of the broilers believed to have been fed contaminated product have since been processed. The breeders that were fed the contaminated product are under voluntary hold by the flock owners.

As with exposure from hogs fed contaminated pet food and for similar reasons related to the dilution of the contamination, FDA and USDA believe the likelihood of illness after eating chicken fed the contaminated product is very low. Because there is no evidence of harm to humans associated with consumption of chicken fed the contaminated product, no recall of poultry products processed from these animals is being issued. Testing and the joint investigation continue. If any evidence surfaces to indicate there is harm to humans, the appropriate action will be taken.

Because the poultry being held have been fed adulterated products, USDA cannot knowingly approve products derived from these poultry for human consumption. USDA is offering to compensate producers who euthanize this poultry. USDA is also offering the expertise and assistance of Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) personnel in carrying out depopulation activities, to ensure adherence to Federal and State laws.

FDA and USDA anticipate that as the investigation continues additional farms will likely be identified that received contaminated feed. As indicated in previous updates, FDA and USDA have also traced contaminated feed to swine farms in several states. The same procedures are being followed in relation to both swine and poultry; animals are being quarantined by state order or voluntarily held by the owners and USDA is offering compensation for depopulation and disposal of both swine and poultry that have been fed contaminated products.

USDA and FDA continue to conduct a full, comprehensive examination to protect the nation’s food supply and will provide updates as new information is confirmed.





Melamine and Melamine Related Compounds...

Pet Foods=Human Foods... It's All the Same Thing

Pet Food Recall Expands to Rice Protein...

Royal Canin States: We're Not Involved...

The Pet Food Recall Expands... Again.

FDA Announces: Melamine in Tainted Pet Foods...

Menu Foods Posts FAQ's Page...

Pet Food Recall...

Still Looking for Answers on the 2007 Pet Food Recall...

Menu Foods Pet Food Recall Update

Labels:

Sunday, April 29, 2007

Melamine and Melamine-Related Compounds...

As time goes on the FDA continues to release information multiple times each week concerning the pet food recall.

We now have the USDA, FSIS (USDA's Food Safety Inspection Service), and the FDA all working on this huge problem. This catastrophic event could run into 100's of millions of dollars.

Especially since contaminated foodstuffs were fed to hogs by pork producers. These were hogs destined for human consumption and have now been quarantined. Not only that, it seems that hog producers will be compensated by the federal government for "depopulation". I felt that this was an interesting statement as well (bold is my emphasis):

The contaminants in question include melamine and melamine-related compounds, including cyanuric acid, the combination of which is a potential source of concern in relation to human and animal health. Scientific research indicates that melamine alone, at detected levels, is not a human health concern. However, no scientific data exist to ascertain the effects of combining melamine and melamine-related compounds. Therefore, a determination has not yet been made regarding the safety of the product.



Hmmm...


As scientists continue to scour the samples and try to identify every possible source of contamination, it's quite possible that they will continue to find more substances in our foods that aren't supposed to be there.


It appears that nearly every major pet food manufacturer has been affected since new recalls continue to be announced. This past week alone gave us these announcements:

*Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc. Recalls Products in Response to American Nutrition Inc. Pet Food Recall (April 27, 2007)

*American Nutrition, Inc. Issues Voluntary Recall (April 26, 2007)

*Blue Buffalo Recalls Can and Biscuit Products Due To Tampering By American Nutrition Inc. (April 26, 2007)

*Diamond Pet Food Withdraws Products in Response to American Nutrition Inc. Pet Food Recall (April 26, 2007)

*Chenango Valley Pet Foods Issues Voluntarily Nationwide Recall of Certain Pet Foods (April 26, 2007)



You can go to the FDA Pet Food Recall page to keep up to date on the changing events.

Now that there are hundreds of pet food labels that have been affected, the FDA has also developed a searchable web page where you can search for your particular pet food in their database. I think that this is probably one of the best things that the FDA could have done as far as getting accurate and reliable information to the public.

All of this information should set aside any deragatory comments or ill-feelings towards Menu Foods Income Fund. Especially those comments about the company purposefully putting poison in the pet foods. Which I personally felt was an absurd and ludicrous thought.

Of course, there are people still wanting to find someone that they can sue over all of this. And a quick search pops up all kinds of lawyers who are just waiting for a phone call or an e-mail.


Nonetheless, I would like to point out how small bits and pieces of information are filtered down to us, the general public. And I would like to draw attention to the fact that we still don't really have a lot of answers concerning this crisis. The pet food companies are limited on the outflow of information to their consumers as well.

Of course, this all makes me begin to wonder why. It could be that there is a government gag order on all of this until all the information has been gathered. It is also possible that there are some major diplomatic problems going on with China. You did hear about the tainted corn gluten in Africa that came from China right?

And that it appears that the addition of melamin to these products appears to be intentional?

So all of this has become quite an international incident. It will be quite interesting to find out what will become of all of this.

If we get to hear about it that is.


As a side note, it seems that there is a new "advertising" website that has been set up to possibly generate some income from all of this. I presume that it is for the purpose of making money as it has several advertisers on it.

How did I find out about it?

Well, it seems that this website has placed a link to one of my posts on their page.

It has this picture:



With the words "Read a Blog and enjoy a Hamburger - DogsCatsKidsLife which is linked back to this post.

*scratches chin*

So this led me to check on my Google Adsense account. You know, to see if my blog has profited from all of this. I haven't checked it in six months or more. Mostly because you don't get a check until your account reaches $100. And I figured that would be somewhere around 2018 at about .01 cent a click.

Of course, it's hard to tell if any of the clicks are directly related to the pet food recall posts. However, it does appear that I have made about .22 cents since it all began.


Maybe I should see if I can get into law school after I graduate.


later...



Pet Food Recall Expands to Rice Protein...

Royal Canin States: We're Not Involved...

The Pet Food Recall Expands... Again.

FDA Announces: Melamine in Tainted Pet Foods...

Menu Foods Posts FAQ's Page...

Pet Food Recall...

Still Looking for Answers on the 2007 Pet Food Recall...

Menu Foods Pet Food Recall Update

Labels: ,

Friday, April 27, 2007

Who's Who Researched...

Victoria Strauss is on top of all things involved with writer, publisher, and editor scams. She provides a public service to thousands of aspiring writers and authors.

However, she has stepped outside the subject of the publishing industry to write an article about who's who registries.

She has uncovered some very interesting information. What I think is the most interesting is how many of these registries are linked to each other. Evidently, if you are a who's who networking opportunity or registry, and your image becomes tarnished from your poor business tactics, the best way to handle the public relations problem is to just start another who's who organization.

Maybe it's too much trouble to legitimately correct your marketing difficulties?

Ms. Strauss provides a plethora of links to a lot of who's who organizations. She has also made a correlation between Cambridge Who's Who, Manchester Who's Who, and Metropolitan Who's Who. These three organizations appear to be generating income for a single entity.

She also clarifies the fact that who's who registries have a registry for just about every industry in America. Registries are available in religion, science, and executives and professionals. There are even opportunities for women only.

I feel that Ms. Strauss has a done a wonderful job in researching the subject of who's who registries because I know for a fact that it is very difficult to find information about some of these organizations.

Mostly because they threaten anyone who publishes negative information about them with lawsuits.

And the sad thing about it is, is that many people succumb to their intimidation tactics and delete their posts out of fear of retribution. I feel that these acts alone speak volumes about the integrity of the organization.

Ms. Strauss also provides a link to this post which was written by Shawn Olson. His post has been targeted by Manchester Who's Who.

As more individuals like him and Darrell at Southcon stand up for their freedom of speech rights, hopefully a message will be conveyed to these individuals. If who's who registries feel that they have the right to run a business with poor business practices, morals, and ethics then surely everyone else has the right to speak about their experiences with them as well.


Meanwhile, I hope that those who are researching information about the letter that they received in the mail have found the information they are looking for.

later...





Metropolitan Who's who aka Metropolitan Registries, Inc...

Questions...

Hate E-mail and Threatened Bloggers...

Blogger's Rights...

Do Search Engines Serve the Public?

Labels:

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Pet Foods = Human Foods... It's All the Same Thing...

Linda in Norman gave me a heads up on this article:

FDA Examines if Pet Food Contaminant in Human Food

The FDA named the six grain products to be inspected as wheat gluten, corn gluten, corn meal, soy protein, rice bran and rice protein.

"We're going to target firms that we know are receiving imported products," said David Acheson, chief medical officer of the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition in a conference call with reporters. "The goal is obviously to sample as much as we can."



Like I said before, many of these pet food manufacturers have always been proud of the fact that they have been using "human quality" ingredients in their foods.


And that's been my biggest concern about this whole fiasco. This stuff is bound to be in our *people* foods.


On Monday, two U.S. lawmakers said a second company likely imported rice protein from China that was contaminated with Melamine. FDA officials on Tuesday would not say whether there was a second importer.



Those folks who said all of those "not nice" things about Menu Foods should take back what they said.


*darn*

I just now realized that my kids are going to be real upset if they find out that they're going to have to give up their Doritoes.


*geez*


Are we going to have to start trying to eat healthy now and give up all of our over-processed fake foods because of all of this?


later...






Pet Food Recall Expands to Rice Protein...

Royal Canin States: We're Not Involved...

The Pet Food Recall Expands... Again.

FDA Announces: Melamine in Tainted Pet Foods...

Menu Foods Posts FAQ's Page...

Pet Food Recall...

Still Looking for Answers on the 2007 Pet Food Recall...

Menu Foods Pet Food Recall Update

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Pet Food Recall Expands to Rice Protein...

If there ever was a silver lining to a bad situation, I would have to say that the "Pet Food Recall(s) of 2007" would have to have one.

Rice protein from China has now been found to contain the contaminant melamine. Another imported food product from China, the FDA is finding itself scrambling for information once again.

Hill's Science Diet has already issued a statement that the rice protein products that they use do not come from the same source as the contaminated product does. However, Natural Balance has several products that are part of the latest recall. This product is not the same as the Natural Life vegetarian product that Menu Foods added to their list yesterday.

As the trail of the rice protein is followed, be assured that more pet food stuffs will be added to the enormously long list of recalled pet foods.

The FDA seems to have hit a roadblock in their investigations since China will not allow FDA inspectors to go investigate the manufacturing facilities that are producing the tainted products. The FDA inspectors are unable to get Visas to China because the government hasn't "invited" them to come. With China dragging its uncooperative feet in this food health crisis, it appears that maybe someone at the FDA may have run across some information which led to the testing of rice proteins.

Both ingredients were imported from China, though by different companies and from different manufacturers.

The FDA on Wednesday began reviewing and sampling all rice protein concentrate imported from China, much as the agency has been doing for wheat gluten, Rogers said.


This news story also shares some interesting information about why melamine would be found in wheat gluten and rice protein:

The Las Vegas importer of the contaminated Chinese wheat gluten, ChemNutra Inc., that led to the original pet food recall has suggested that spiking a product with melamine can make it to appear to be richer in protein during tests, thus increasing its value.


Economics can certainly be a strong motivator for many.


But if economics isn't the motivation behind all of this mess then I can only conjure up one other hypothesis for why their products are contaminated.

I don't know about you, but when I think of big food manufacturing companies I think of big stainless steel vats and gas fueled flames. You know, shiny equipment that's squeaky clean. However, this may not be the case in parts of China.

It's possible that the products have been tainted by the "microwave effect" with huge melamine laden plastic vats receiving extremely hot products into their bowels. The heat and moisture combines with the plastics used in the processing of the foods and therefore leeches chemicals into the food stuffs.

I envision something similar to overheating your leftover pizza on a styrofoam plate.

One can't be extracted from the other.

*yuck*


Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the "silver lining".

Well, the best thing about all of this is...

That FDA officials are now alert to ~something~ wrong in the Chinese food manufacturing process. And something must have sent up a red flag for them to start testing rice protein. Something that we don't yet know about.

So now I would have to logically conclude that (hopefully at least) all food imports from China will be more thoroughly tested.

Especially the human food stuffs.

Next big question:

How will all of this affect the American and Chinese political and economic relations?


Fortune cookie anyone?


later...


***UPDATE***

Blue Buffalo Company Announces Voluntary Recall of One Production Run of Spa Select Kitten Dry Food


Royal Canin has been affected by the rice protein recall.

April 19, 2007

Dear Royal Canin USA Customer,

It is with sincere regret that I inform you of a new and unfortunate development with some of our pet food products.

Although we have no confirmed cases of illness in pets, we have decided to voluntarily remove the following dry pet food products that contain rice protein concentrate due to the presence of a melamine derivative.

ROYAL CANIN SENSIBLE CHOICE® (available in pet specialty stores nationwide)

- Chicken Meal & Rice Formula Senior DRY DOG FOOD
- Lamb Meal & Rice Formula Puppy DRY DOG FOOD
- Lamb Meal & Rice Formula Adult DRY DOG FOOD
- Lamb Meal & Rice Formula Senior DRY DOG FOOD
- Rice & Catfish Meal Formula Adult DRY DOG FOOD

ROYAL CANIN VETERINARY DIET™ (available only in veterinary clinics)

- Canine Early Cardiac EC 22™
- Canine Skin Support SS21™
- Feline Hypoallergenic HP23™

ALL PRODUCTS WITH AN EXPIRATION DATE OF APRIL 19TH, 2008 ARE MADE WITHOUT CHINESE SOURCED VEGETABLE PROTEINS AND ARE SAFE.

We are taking this proactive stance to voluntarily recall these products to avoid any confusion for our customers about which Royal Canin USA products are safe and which products may be affected.

Pet owners should immediately stop feeding their pets the Royal Canin USA dry pet food products listed above. Pet owners should consult with a veterinarian if they are concerned about the health of their pet. No other Royal Canin diets are affected by this recall and CONTINUE TO BE safe for pets to eat.

In addition, Royal Canin USA will no longer use any Chinese suppliers for any of our vegetable proteins.

This decision to recall some of our dry pet food products is driven by our philosophy that the “Pet Comes First”. The safety and nutritional quality of our pet food is Royal Canin USA’s top priority. Pet owners who have questions about this recall and other Royal Canin USA products should call (800) 513-0041.

On behalf of the entire Royal Canin family, our hearts go out to the pet owners and everyone in the pet community who have been affected by all of the recent recalls. We are as passionate about the health and happiness of our customers’ pets as we are of our own, so we are committed to taking the steps necessary to ensure this never happens again.

Sincerely,

Olivier Amice
President and CEO
Royal Canin USA






Royal Canin States: We're Not Involved...

The Pet Food Recall Expands... Again.

FDA Announces: Melamine in Tainted Pet Foods...

Menu Foods Posts FAQ's Page...

Pet Food Recall...

Still Looking for Answers on the 2007 Pet Food Recall...

Menu Foods Pet Food Recall Update

Labels: ,

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Metropolitan Who's Who... An Update.

Connie has noticed a recent increase of hits on
her 2006 post concerning Metropolitan Who's Who.

And I have noticed an increase of visits to my post as well.

There are people using a variety of search terms trying to find out information about the registry. Search terms vary but for the most part they use terms like:

"Metropolitan Who's Who Scam"

"Metropolitan Who's Who is it any good"

"Metropolitan Registries"

"Metropolitan Who's Who complaints"

"fraud Metropolitan Who's Who"

"is Metropolitan Who's Who good"


I won't try to list all of the various terms here, but I think you get the idea.


I suppose the sudden influx of people searching for information on Metropolitan Who's Who is because they have received a letter from them.

Metropolitan Who's Who must mail millions of letters!

From this last mass mailing batch I know of at least one person (so far) who has blogged about the receipt of their letter of recognition.

Ellie's Mommie has written about Ellie's Daddy receiving one of MWW's letters. She's very proud of his accomplishments as a pizza delivery boy and states,

I too strive to be recognized on the same level as my pizza delivery man!!


Her comments remind me of Southcon's post about his letter.

Oh the joys that they share by virtue of being on the same mailing list.

It certainly warms my heart.


I know that Cyndi Jeffus, aka Cyndi Jeffers, aka Amanda, is concerned about bloggers who post about Metropolitan Who's Who. She's also unhappy about other web sources of information concerning the organization that she works for.

I also know that she is concerned about my contributions as well.

It seems that she is petitioning the Better Business Bureau of New York City and has asked them to review/update their report.

I'm so glad that I have placed the original text of the January, 2007, report here.

We'll have to wait and see how the new report "reads" when it comes out. Surely the BBB will be honest and straightforward in their *new* report. Because if they aren't and are coerced to "gloss over" the facts...

Then they lose credibility and are no longer a trusted source of information.

Surely they have a strong code of ethics that they follow.


If not, then I will probably have to write a letter to the national office and a blog post about it all.


The BBB of New York realizes that there is a problem concerning who's who registries. In fact, they have a web page full of advice for consumers.

This is probably my favorite line on the entire web page:

If you are solicited for inclusion in a biographical work, be realistic about your own accomplishments. Determine if the appeal is based strictly on personal vanity.


I think that maintaining honesty and integrity is an accomplishment.

An accomplishment, that sadly, many people will never achieve.


I certainly believe that both Ellie's Mommie and Southcon deserve recognition in an honest and reputable biographical work.

It could be called The Book of Honest Americans of Integrity.

From what I can tell...

We need a lot more people like them.

later...


**UPDATE**

I've run across another blogger who has posted about their letter from Metropolitan Who's Who!

Hopefully they will keep it posted and aren't coerced into deleting the post.




Metropolitan Who's who aka Metropolitan Registries, Inc...

Questions...

Hate E-mail and Threatened Bloggers...

Blogger's Rights...

Do Search Engines Serve the Public?

Labels:

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Royal Canin States: We're Not Involved...

The press has released a story today that states that Royal Canin products have been added to the national recall list of pet foods.

According to Royal Canin this is not true. The FDA announcement has confirmed that some of the tainted wheat gluten had been transferred to a Canadian manufacturing facility. There have been 26 additional products added to the recall list as of yesterday. However, Royal Canin is not on this newly released list of pet foods.

Below is Royal Canin's announcement as found on their web page:

RECALL INFORMATION

Royal Canin USA wishes to assure pet owners that our dry and wet pet food products are not involved in the ongoing FDA investigation related to the recent nationwide pet food recall initiated by Menu Foods and other companies.

We want to inform you that the recent recall announcement by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on April 10 does not affect any Royal Canin products sold in US retail stores or available in vet clinics.

All of our brands, including Feline Health Nutrition, Canine Health Nutrition, Royal Canin Veterinary Diets, Sensible Choice, and Kasco, continue to be available nationwide.

The safety and nutritional quality of our pet food is our top priority because for many people, their pets are their top priorities.

For details about the recall and affected brands and products, please call Menu Foods at 1-866-895-2708, 1-866-463-6738 or visit the company’s web site at www.menufoods.com/recall for more information.

Labels: ,

Thursday, April 05, 2007

The Pet Food Recall Expands... Again.

As the trail of wheat gluten continues to be followed, I am sure that there is a great possibility that we will continue to see more recalled products surface.

Today, Sunshine Mills has added their dog biscuit products to the recall list.

Evidently, a "boat load" of wheat gluten has been shipped to the United States. Who knows, there could have been two boats full. While it hasn't happened yet, I'm anticipating the recall to surface somewhere in the human food market.

This idea doesn't sound so far fetched today as it did even a week ago.

At this point, my recommendation for everyone would be to read your ingredient labels.

I've always recommended that pets not be fed products with wheat, dairy products or by-products, or anything with dyes. The reasoning behind this recommendation was to reduce the incidence of allergies in our pets. Not because the foodstuffs were inherently bad. Anyway, everyone I personally know should be okay if they were following the recommendations.

For those who are looking for pet foods, treats, or biscuits that have been recalled, your best resource is at the FDA Recall web page. They have every product listed that has been recalled. There are also associated links that will give you the product codes, lot numbers, and dates.

Below I have copied and pasted the contents on that web page, however you should go there so you can follow the links.




Pet Food Recall

Topics on this Page

Introduction
News Updates
What Pet Foods Have Been Recalled?
Other Companies Voluntarily Withdrawing Products
How Do I Report a Pet Food Complaint?


Introduction
On March 16, Menu Foods, Inc. recalled dog and cat foods produced at two of its facilities between Dec. 3, 2006, and March 6, 2007, and sold under a number of different brand names. Several other companies also have voluntarily withdrawn products from the market. See the links below for complete listings.

Frequently Asked Questions About Menu Foods Pet Food Recall
News Updates
Sunshine Mills, Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of Certain Branded and Private Label Branded Dog Biscuits (April 5, 2007)
ChemNutra Announces Nationwide Wheat Gluten Recall (April 3, 2007)
What Pet Foods Have Been Recalled?
Menu Foods Recalled Products

Dog Food Recalls
Cat Food Recalls


Menu Foods Initiates Market Withdrawal of All Varieties of Recalled Wet Pet Food to Ensure Consumer Protection (March 24, 2007)
Other Companies Voluntarily Withdrawing Products
Sunshine Mills, Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of Certain Branded and Private Label Branded Dog Biscuits (April 5, 2007)
ChemNutra Announces Nationwide Wheat Gluten Recall (April 3, 2007)
Del Monte Pet Products
Del Monte Pet Products Voluntarily Withdraws Specific Product Codes of Pet Treats and Wet Dog Food Products (March 31, 2007)
Hills Pet Nutrition
Prescription Diet m/d Feline Dry Food (FDA Press Release, March 30, 2007)
Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. Select Science Diet Savory Cuts Cat Food (March 17, 2007)
Nestlé Purina PetCare Company
Alpo® Brand Prime Cuts In Gravy Canned Dog Food (March 30, 2007)
Mighty Dog® 5.3 Ounce Pouch Products (March 16, 2007)

How Do I Report a Pet Food Complaint?

Please contact your Consumer Complaint Coordinator

Page last updated April 5, 2007

Labels: ,

Friday, March 30, 2007

FDA Announces: Melamine in Tainted Pet Foods...

While the official announcement from the FDA has yet to make it to their website, they have announced that a substance called melamine has been found in the tainted pet foods that were associated with a nationwide recall. Menu Foods' CEO Paul Henderson has made a public statement which has been posted on their website. Melamine is a substance commonly associated with the manufacturing of plastics and is also used as a fertilizer.

The pet food recall has recently been expanded with Hill's Science Diet recalling their dry cat food m/d. Contradicting some of today's news reports that the wheat gluten has not made it into dry pet food products.


Science Diet m/d Recalled March 30, 2007



I'm Just Thinking Out Loud...

I have been thinking quite a bit about the pet food recall but have refrained from posting many of my thoughts about it all. Partly because I have been too busy to do so, but mostly because of a general "wait and see" attitude that I have.

I understand that there have been thousands of anecdotal pet deaths reported across the nation. But that's the biggest problem about it all. They're anecdotal reports. A logical and scientific approach to pets that became ill, or even died, would be that you cannot have a conclusive cause of death without testing, such as is associated with pathology reports and toxicology screening. Additionally, this kind of extensive testing is very time consuming. Even more so when you think about the normal pace of "business as usual" at these laboratories which have most certainly now become inundated with a backlog of tagged specimens.

So for those who are wondering how many pets have died from this recall, there's just not any official numbers out now. And it will probably be quite some time before there are. Especially since another chemical has been identified in the recall. But I am compelled to make a prediction that the official numbers aren't going to be as high as many people want them to be. This certainly puts a kink in the plans of lawyers who are busy filing class action lawsuits, that's for sure.


Now I'm not calling anyone who claims that their pet died or became ill from the recalled pet foods a liar. But one thing that has always been in the forefront of my mind are the cases that I see come in our facility on a daily basis. There are many pet owners who do not seek medical care for their pets at the first onset of their symptoms. Either they simply ignore the symptoms, believe that it is a passing malady, or just don't pay enough attention to their pets to notice the symptoms, until they are pointed out to them by news reports, mass hysteria and fear.

I will venture another prediction. I believe that there is a great possibility that many of the pets who succumbed to the toxins that are present in the recalled foods were already suffering from a chronic illness that had been left undetected. In this compromised state of health, these beloved pets were unable to process these toxins through their natural body processes. In other words, our bodies already have protections in place for events such as these. Both our liver and kidneys are our primary defense. Although they cannot withstand a lethal dose of any poison; neither can our organs operate under "normal" challenges if they are diseased.

If we biopsied our livers and kidneys, who knows what chemicals and compounds could be found there.

There are innumberable pets that are currently suffering from various stages of chronic renal disease. Chronic renal failure that cannot be attributed to the pet food recall. And many of these pets go undiagnosed until there is not any hope for the management of the disease. CRF can be silently progressing for quite some time without obvious symptoms to the casual observer, and that is why we recommend twice a year blood testing and urinalysis for our patients. Catching diseases early means that there will be a greater chance of managing it. I wonder how many of the pets who reportedly became ill from the recalled pet food really did become ill from the food. There are many, many reasons why kidneys can begin to fail, but only laboratory testing will give us these answers.


Another thought that has crossed my mind is the fact that the foods that are being shipped into our country are exposed to many things that aren't commonly used here in the United States. Things that have been deemed to be not healthy. So I wonder what kind of regulations have been placed on the food products that are shipped to the United States. Since many of the pet food companies are proud of the fact that "human grade" products are used in their pet foods it makes me wonder how many of these foreign substances make it into our food supply. And how long have they been there.

Along this train of thought is of course the terrorist aspect of it all. And I certainly couldn't mention something like this without presenting some sort of conspiracy theory. My theory would be that the tainted wheat gluten was destined for human consumption, which some how was diverted to the pet food market instead.


So today we are presented with another substance that was found in the wheat gluten. A substance called melamine. And this raises a whole other train of thought.

First, I would like to say that for some reason I'm not surprised. I just didn't feel that the evidence was there for a nationwide pet poisoning event. We didn't have the influx of critically ill pets in our facility that would have suggested such a problem.

This leads me to the main reason why I am writing this post. Since we did not see any obviously poisoned pets who had consumed the recalled pet foods, I began to think about contaminants that are probably present in all of our foods. Foods that we eat every day.

Let's say we took a food product off of the shelf at our local grocery store. Any product would do, just pick one. And let's say we sent it to a toxicology lab and tested it for every known toxin possible.

How do you think that final report would read?

I think we would be very surprised.


Now for those of you who think that you'll just eat "organic" and fresh foods I have a couple of thoughts.

First of all, organic foods are grown with 'natural' fertilizers. Farmers have to use fertilizers because if they don't produce volume, they can't make any money. These organic fertilizers consist of products such as manure. And manure is laiden with E. coli. Remember the spinach scare?

I personally didn't quit eating spinach. Because I hold a strong belief that the more you limit yourself to exposure to certain things, the more susceptible that you'll be to becoming ill from them. Why else do you think there has been an unprecedented rise in things like childhood asthma in the last few decades? I firmly believe it is because children aren't allowed to play outside and "get dirty". It is only through controlled exposure will you be able to build an immunity to many of the things that are beginning to ail our society.

How about the salmonella in the peanut butter? We had already eaten over two-thirds of the very large jar of peanut butter when the recall came about. And none of us became ill from it.


Now I don't promote poor hygiene or foolish food handling practices. But I don't believe in promoting "germophobia" either. However I do feel that we are causing ourselves more problems than not by trying to become a "sterile society".


With the new information that has come out today concerning the pet food recall, there are certainly a lot more questions and thoughts about the situation that needs to be addressed.

Right now I am beginning to wonder if some kind of radical animal rights or activist group is responsible for this multi-million dollar mess. You know, people like the ones who want to have the rescued polar bear cub, Knut, euthanized. Someone who was upset about the use of test animals in the manufacturing processes of pet food could certainly be the culprit.

Maybe we'll have some definitive answers concerning the "Pet Food Recall of 2007", but I think it will take quite a bit of time before we do.

later...


Menu Foods Posts FAQ's Page...

Pet Food Recall...

Still Looking for Answers on the 2007 Pet Food Recall...

Menu Foods Pet Food Recall Update


If you are concerned about your pet's health you should contact your veterinarian. We have had numerous calls at work from concerned pet owners. There are several pet owners who have brought their animals in as well for laboratory blood testing and a urinalysis. Laboratory testing is the only way that you will be able to tell for sure if your pet's kidneys are functioning properly. Pet owners must also take into consideration that 75% of the kidney is usually damaged before some symptoms and laboratory changes occur. There may be additional testing required as well such as a protein/creatinine ratio test.

Some of the symptoms of renal failure include:

*anorexia (loss of appetitie)
*depression or lack of energy
*vomiting
*increased water intake (polydipsia)
*increased urination (poluria)
*diarrhea

Advanced stages of renal failure will have symptoms of:

*gastrointestinal ulcerations
*oral ulcerations
*bad breath
*weight loss
*weakness
*exercise intolerance
*anuria (no urine output due to complete failure of kidney function)

If your pet is experiencing any of these symptoms it is recommended that you take them to your veterinarian as soon as possible.





**UPDATE**

The FDA announcement has been posted.

FDA News
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
P07-57
March 30, 2007

Media Inquiries:
Michael Herndon
Catherine McDermott
301-827-6242

Consumer Inquiries:
888-INFO-FDA



FDA Finds Melamine in Wheat Gluten used by Hill's Pet Nutrition
Company Initiates Recall of Dry Cat Food
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today notified Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., of Topeka, Kansas, that FDA testing has detected melamine and melamine byproducts in wheat gluten received by the company to make dry cat food. FDA is conducting an investigation into pet food products made with wheat gluten that contains melamine and their association with reports of injury and deaths in cats and dogs.

Because the cat food is sold exclusively through veterinarians, Hill's has notified veterinarians, and is voluntarily recalling the pet food containing the wheat gluten and will conduct its own testing.

Consumers who have any bags of Prescription Diet m/d Feline should discontinue use. They should speak with their veterinarian if their pet shows any signs of kidney/renal illness. Such signs include loss of appetite, lethargy and vomiting.

"FDA recognizes that pets are very important to the American people and our sympathies go out to those who have lost their beloved pets," said Stephen Sundlof, D.V.M., director of the Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration.

During two months in early 2007, Hill's Pet Nutrition manufactured Prescription Diet m/d Feline using wheat gluten from the same company that has supplied wheat gluten to Menu Foods, Inc. Menu Foods, Inc. (menufoods.com/recall) has also voluntarily recalled products potentially contaminated with melamine. See http://www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/petfood.html for more information on the pet food recall.

The Hill’s cat food now being recalled is labeled Prescription Diet m/d Feline dry food. The products are:

4 lb. bag, U.S. & Canada UPC code 52742 42770
10 lb. bag, U.S. & Canada UPC code 52742 42790
The agency is continuing to work with Menu Foods, Inc., and Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., to ensure the effectiveness of their recalls.

For more information, consumers may contact Hills Pet Nutrition at 1-800-445-5777 or visit www.HillsPet.com.

Labels: ,

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Menu Foods Posts FAQ's Page...

***UPDATE*** March 30, 2007

FDA Announces: Melamine in Tainted Pet Foods...




Menu Foods Income Fund has posted a FAQ page for consumers. I have copied and pasted the contents of the page below:

1. What exactly is covered by the Menu Foods Recall and for what timeframe?



The recall is limited to “cuts and gravy” style pet food in cans and foil pouches produced on specific dates and times between December 3, 2006, and March 6, 2007 in two of Menu’s plants. The recall affects 42 brands of cat food and 53 brands of dog food. In order to determine whether cat and dog food that your pet consumed is subject to recall, you should refer to the list of brand names on this website.



2. What should I do if I think my pet may have consumed the recalled product?



If your pet is exhibiting any signs of kidney failure please contact your veterinarian as soon as possible. Symptoms include loss of appetite, vomiting, weakness, disorientation and changes in water consumption and urination. If you suspect that you have fed the recalled pet food to your cat or dog, save any remaining pet food and the can or pouch. Open cans or pouches may be double-bagged in sealable plastic and kept in the freezer.



3. Who is going to pay my vet bills for sickness and death?



If Menu Foods product is the cause of sickness or death, Menu Foods will take responsibility. Menu has engaged a professional firm to manage your concerns and is currently contacting concerned pet owners who have reached our call center. Specific direction will be received from these individuals. Please keep copies of all your vet records and receipts for pet food purchases as well as vet bills.



4. What do I do if I have pet food that has been recalled?



Please return it to the retailer for a refund.



5. Will I be reimbursed for the food that I return to the retailer even if my pet did not get sick?



Yes, if it is a valid product that is subject to the recall.



6. How do I know if the food I bought has been recalled?



The information is contained on this website. Not all date codes are subject to recall so please fully check the information on your can or pouch. The information on the website is organized by cat or dog then by brand and description. None of the traditional “loaf” style products are subject to this recall.



7. I can’t get through to the 1-866 numbers. What is going on?



We apologize for the delay in answering every call; we were simply overwhelmed by the volume of calls. Menu has retained a series of interconnected call centers throughout North America. Even with many regional centers running simultaneously we have not been able to answer every call. As we announced in a press release on March 19, 2007, we have taken steps to significantly upgrade our call centers to handle the volume and we have added this Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQ”) section to our website to provide more information.



8. I feed my pet dry food. Is dry pet food safe?



Menu Foods only manufactures wet pet food in cans and foil pouches. Dry pet food is not part of the Menu Foods recall.



9. I’m just not sure if my dog or cat had any of the food that is being recalled. They act fine and don’t appear to have any symptoms. Should I be worried?



As always, remain alert for any changes in your pet’s health.



10. Are there other ways my pet might get sick and show similar symptoms?



Yes – antifreeze ingestion, certain rodenticides and some medications. Certain lilies have been shown to cause kidney failure if consumed by cats. Grapes have been reported to cause kidney failure in dogs and may affect cats. Physical damage from trauma and cancerous conditions can also cause kidney damage.



There have been several search queries on how to pronounce aminopterin. For those of you who are interested, it is phonetically pronounced the same way it is spelled:

am - in - op' - ter - in


Go here to view the list of recalled cat foods. This list of brands has links to the product codes that are affected.

Recalled Cat Product Information
Recall Information 1-866-895-2708
Variety or Multi-Packs:

If you are in possession of a variety or multi-pack, please be sure to check the individual can or pouch rather than relying solely on the date coding on the side of the carton.

Americas Choice, Preferred Pets
Authority
Best Choice
Companion
Compliments
Demoulas Market Basket
Eukanuba
Fine Feline Cat
Food Lion
Foodtown
Giant Companion
Hannaford
Hill Country Fare
Hy-Vee
Iams
Laura Lynn
Li'l Red
Loving Meals
Meijer's Main Choice
Nutriplan
Nutro Max Gourmet Classics
Nutro Natural Choice
Paws
Pet Pride
Presidents Choice
Price Chopper
Priority US
Save-A-Lot Special Blend
Schnucks
Science Diet Feline Savory Cuts Cans
Sophistacat
Special Kitty Canada
Special Kitty US
Springfield Prize
Sprout
Stop & Shop Companion
Tops Companion
Wegmans
Weis Total Pet
Western Family US
White Rose
Winn Dixie


Go here to view the list of recalled dog foods. This list of brands has links to the product codes that are affected.

Recalled Dog Product Information
Recall Information 1-866-895-2708
Variety or Multi-Packs:

If you are in possession of a variety or multi-pack, please be sure to check the individual can or pouch rather than relying solely on the date coding on the side of the carton.

Americas Choice, Preferred Pets
Authority
Award
Best Choice
Big Bet
Big Red
Bloom
Cadillac
Companion
Demoulas Market Basket
Eukanuba
Food Lion
Giant Companion
Great Choice
Hannaford
Hill Country Fare
Hy-Vee
Iams
Laura Lynn
Loving Meals
Meijers Main Choice
Mighty Dog Pouch
Mixables
Nutriplan
Nutro Max
Nutro Natural Choice
Nutro Ultra
Nutro
Ol'Roy Canada
Ol'Roy US
Paws
Pet Essentials
Pet Pride - Good n Meaty
Presidents Choice
Price Chopper
Priority Canada
Priority US
Publix
Roche Brothers
Save-A-Lot Choice Morsels
Schnucks
Shep Dog
Springsfield Prize
Sprout
Stater Brothers
Stop & Shop Companion
Tops Companion
Wegmans Bruiser
Weis Total Pet
Western Family US
White Rose
Winn Dixie
Your Pet


From what I can tell, the only expansion in the list is the inclusion of the voluntary and precautionary recalls by Iams, Eukanuba, Hill's Science Diet, Purina, and Canadian brands of pet foods. However, Menu Foods has requested that all of the cuts and gravy styles of pet foods be returned, irregardless of date, because some of the tainted foods are still on retailers shelves.




Below is my original post concerning the massive pet food recall. In this post you will also find information concerning foods that were recalled as a precautionary measure by Iams, Science Diet, and Purina. I would like for pet owners to be aware of the fact that these foods WERE NOT part of the original recall. These three companies recalled their products as a precautionary measure. For some reason, the mainstream media has presented their information and reports with a bias towards the Iams Company with pictures of their products as well as statements in their newscasts. I feel that this is irresponsible journalism. I also want to state that the news reports have tried in earnest to fan the flames of panic, anger, and mistrust towards companies who are trying their best to do what is right.

I also would like to make an observation concerning consumers' frustration about the hotline telephone numbers. While I understand their frustrations, all of the information that you need is readily available online. Who in their right mind thinks that ANY call center can handle MILLIONS of telephone calls in one day? Additionally, if the mainstream media truly was concerned about your pets you would have had this information available to you through their newsreports. This would have been the easiest and best way to disseminate information to millions of pet owners. If only the MSM had chosen to do so. Instead we received hype, spin, and inaccuracies just so they could generate income for themselves.


Pet Food Recall...

Still Looking for Answers on the 2007 Pet Food Recall...

Menu Foods Pet Food Recall Update

Labels: ,